How to use

Advanced Search

Search Sites

TOP
Tetsu-to-Hagané
Vol. 101 (2015), No. 12

Tetsu-to-Hagané Vol. 101 (2015), No. 12

Grid List Abstracts

ONLINE ISSN:	1883-2954
PRINT ISSN:	0021-1575
Publisher:	The Iron and Steel Institute of Japan

Backnumber

Vol. 109 (2023)
1. No.10
2. No.9
3. No.8
4. No.7
5. No.6
6. No.5
7. No.4
8. No.3
9. No.2
10. No.1
Vol. 108 (2022)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 107 (2021)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 106 (2020)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 105 (2019)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 104 (2018)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 103 (2017)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 102 (2016)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 101 (2015)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 100 (2014)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 99 (2013)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 98 (2012)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 97 (2011)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 96 (2010)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 95 (2009)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 94 (2008)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 93 (2007)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 92 (2006)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 91 (2005)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 90 (2004)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 89 (2003)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 88 (2002)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 87 (2001)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 86 (2000)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 85 (1999)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 84 (1998)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 83 (1997)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 82 (1996)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 81 (1995)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 80 (1994)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 79 (1993)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 78 (1992)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 77 (1991)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 76 (1990)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 75 (1989)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 74 (1988)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 73 (1987)
1. No.16
2. No.15
3. No.14
4. No.13
5. No.12
6. No.11
7. No.10
8. No.9
9. No.8
10. No.7
11. No.6
12. No.5
13. No.4
14. No.3
15. No.2
16. No.1
Vol. 72 (1986)
1. No.16
2. No.15
3. No.14
4. No.13
5. No.12
6. No.11
7. No.10
8. No.9
9. No.8
10. No.7
11. No.6
12. No.5
13. No.4
14. No.3
15. No.2
16. No.1
Vol. 71 (1985)
1. No.16
2. No.15
3. No.14
4. No.13
5. No.12
6. No.11
7. No.10
8. No.9
9. No.8
10. No.7
11. No.6
12. No.5
13. No.4
14. No.3
15. No.2
16. No.1
Vol. 70 (1984)
1. No.16
2. No.15
3. No.14
4. No.13
5. No.12
6. No.11
7. No.10
8. No.9
9. No.8
10. No.7
11. No.6
12. No.5
13. No.4
14. No.3
15. No.2
16. No.1
Vol. 69 (1983)
1. No.16
2. No.15
3. No.14
4. No.13
5. No.12
6. No.11
7. No.10
8. No.9
9. No.8
10. No.7
11. No.6
12. No.5
13. No.4
14. No.3
15. No.2
16. No.1
Vol. 68 (1982)
1. No.16
2. No.15
3. No.14
4. No.13
5. No.12
6. No.11
7. No.10
8. No.9
9. No.8
10. No.7
11. No.6
12. No.5
13. No.4
14. No.3
15. No.2
16. No.1
Vol. 67 (1981)
1. No.16
2. No.15
3. No.14
4. No.13
5. No.12
6. No.11
7. No.10
8. No.9
9. No.8
10. No.7
11. No.6
12. No.5
13. No.4
14. No.3
15. No.2
16. No.1
Vol. 66 (1980)
1. No.14
2. No.13
3. No.12
4. No.11
5. No.10
6. No.9
7. No.8
8. No.7
9. No.6
10. No.5
11. No.4
12. No.3
13. No.2
14. No.1
Vol. 65 (1979)
1. No.14
2. No.13
3. No.12
4. No.11
5. No.10
6. No.9
7. No.8
8. No.7
9. No.6
10. No.5
11. No.4
12. No.3
13. No.2
14. No.1
Vol. 64 (1978)
1. No.14
2. No.13
3. No.12
4. No.11
5. No.10
6. No.9
7. No.8
8. No.7
9. No.6
10. No.5
11. No.4
12. No.3
13. No.2
14. No.1
Vol. 63 (1977)
1. No.14
2. No.13
3. No.12
4. No.11
5. No.10
6. No.9
7. No.8
8. No.7
9. No.6
10. No.5
11. No.4
12. No.3
13. No.2
14. No.1
Vol. 62 (1976)
1. No.14
2. No.13
3. No.12
4. No.11
5. No.10
6. No.9
7. No.8
8. No.7
9. No.6
10. No.5
11. No.4
12. No.3
13. No.2
14. No.1
Vol. 61 (1975)
1. No.15
2. No.14
3. No.13
4. No.12
5. No.11
6. No.10
7. No.9
8. No.8
9. No.7
10. No.6
11. No.5
12. No.4
13. No.3
14. No.2
15. No.1
Vol. 60 (1974)
1. No.14
2. No.13
3. No.12
4. No.11
5. No.10
6. No.9
7. No.8
8. No.7
9. No.6
10. No.5
11. No.4
12. No.3
13. No.2
14. No.1
Vol. 59 (1973)
1. No.14
2. No.13
3. No.12
4. No.11
5. No.10
6. No.9
7. No.8
8. No.7
9. No.6
10. No.5
11. No.4
12. No.3
13. No.2
14. No.1
Vol. 58 (1972)
1. No.14
2. No.13
3. No.12
4. No.11
5. No.10
6. No.9
7. No.8
8. No.7
9. No.6
10. No.5
11. No.4
12. No.3
13. No.2
14. No.1
Vol. 57 (1971)
1. No.14
2. No.13
3. No.12
4. No.11
5. No.10
6. No.9
7. No.8
8. No.7
9. No.6
10. No.5
11. No.4
12. No.3
13. No.2
14. No.1
Vol. 56 (1970)
1. No.14
2. No.13
3. No.12
4. No.11
5. No.10
6. No.9
7. No.8
8. No.7
9. No.6
10. No.5
11. No.4
12. No.3
13. No.2
14. No.1
Vol. 55 (1969)
1. No.14
2. No.13
3. No.12
4. No.11
5. No.10
6. No.9
7. No.8
8. No.7
9. No.6
10. No.5
11. No.4
12. No.3
13. No.2
14. No.1
Vol. 54 (1968)
1. No.14
2. No.13
3. No.12
4. No.11
5. No.10
6. No.9
7. No.8
8. No.7
9. No.6
10. No.5
11. No.4
12. No.3
13. No.2
14. No.1
Vol. 53 (1967)
1. No.14
2. No.13
3. No.12
4. No.11
5. No.10
6. No.9
7. No.8
8. No.7
9. No.6
10. No.5
11. No.4
12. No.3
13. No.2
14. No.1
Vol. 52 (1966)
1. No.13
2. No.12
3. No.11
4. No.10
5. No.9
6. No.8
7. No.7
8. No.6
9. No.5
10. No.4
11. No.3
12. No.2
13. No.1
Vol. 51 (1965)
1. No.13
2. No.12
3. No.11
4. No.10
5. No.9
6. No.8
7. No.7
8. No.6
9. No.5
10. No.4
11. No.3
12. No.2
13. No.1
Vol. 50 (1964)
1. No.14
2. No.13
3. No.12
4. No.11
5. No.10
6. No.9
7. No.8
8. No.7
9. No.6
10. No.5
11. No.4
12. No.3
13. No.2
14. No.1
Vol. 49 (1963)
1. No.14
2. No.13
3. No.12
4. No.11
5. No.10
6. No.9
7. No.8
8. No.7
9. No.6
10. No.5
11. No.4
12. No.3
13. No.2
14. No.1
Vol. 48 (1962)
1. No.14
2. No.13
3. No.12
4. No.11
5. No.10
6. No.9
7. No.8
8. No.7
9. No.6
10. No.5
11. No.4
12. No.3
13. No.2
14. No.1
Vol. 47 (1961)
1. No.14
2. No.13
3. No.12
4. No.11
5. No.10
6. No.9
7. No.8
8. No.7
9. No.6
10. No.5
11. No.4
12. No.3
13. No.2
14. No.1
Vol. 46 (1960)
1. No.14
2. No.13
3. No.12
4. No.11
5. No.10
6. No.9
7. No.8-supl
8. No.7
9. No.6
10. No.5
11. No.4
12. No.3
13. No.2
14. No.1
Vol. 45 (1959)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 44 (1958)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 43 (1957)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 42 (1956)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1
Vol. 41 (1955)
1. No.12
2. No.11
3. No.10
4. No.9
5. No.8
6. No.7
7. No.6
8. No.5
9. No.4
10. No.3
11. No.2
12. No.1

Keyword Ranking

02 Oct. (Last 30 Days)

Tetsu-to-Hagané Vol. 101 (2015), No. 12

Effects of Hydrogen and Nitrogen Gas Mixture on Nitrogen Absorption Rate in Low Carbon Steel Melt

Seiji Nabeshima, Hisashi Ogawa, Yuji Miki

pp. 627-635

DOI:

10.2355/tetsutohagane.TETSU-2015-026

Abstract

To clarify the effects of blowing a H₂-N₂ mixture onto the surface of molten steel containing various oxygen contents on the absorption reaction of nitrogen in the molten steel, experimental studies were carried out using a 20 kg induction furnace. Blowing of the H₂-N₂ mixture accelerates the nitrogen absorption rate because the oxygen concentration at the gas-metal interface is decreased by the reducing effect of the hydrogen gas. The apparent chemical reaction rate of nitrogen absorption in the present work was evaluated at almost the same reaction rate as that of desorption of nitrogen in previous works. Furthermore, a mathematical model for the nitrogen absorption and desorption reactions in a RH degasser was developed in order to estimate the contribution of each nitrogen reaction site during decarburization and killing treatment with injection of pure N₂ gas or the H₂-N₂ mixture in the molten steel. Using the mathematical model, it was estimated that a larger increase in the nitrogen concentration during decarburization treatment could be achieved by applying a 30% H₂-N₂ mixture to the injection gas in the RH degasser than by applying pure N₂ gas.

Readers Who Read This Article Also Read

Trickle Flow Behaviors of Liquid Iron and Molten Slag in the Lower Part of Blast Furnace

Tetsu-to-Hagané Vol.100(2014), No.8

Numerical Simulation of Bubble Rising in Liquid

Tetsu-to-Hagané Vol.101(2015), No.2

Effect of Slag Melting Behavior on Metal-Slag Separation Temperature in Powdery Iron, Slag and Carbon Mixture

Tetsu-to-Hagané Vol.98(2012), No.12

Bookmark

Detail

PDF Download

Share it with SNS

Article Title

Effects of Hydrogen and Nitrogen Gas Mixture on Nitrogen Absorption Rate in Low Carbon Steel Melt

Bibtex

Ris

Removal of Cu in Carbon Saturated Iron by Sulfurization via Ag Phase

Katsuhiro Yamaguchi, Hideki Ono, Eiichi Takeuchi

pp. 636-644

DOI:

10.2355/tetsutohagane.TETSU-2015-039

Abstract

The copper distribution ratio between the Na₂S flux and silver, L_Cu(flux-Ag) (=[mass% Cu]_{(in flux)} / [mass% Cu]_{(in Ag)}), was measured at 1473 K in order to know the copper capacity of Na₂S flux. As the greatest value, L_Cu(flux-Ag) = 42 was obtained. By combining the L_Cu(flux-Ag) value with the distribution ratio of copper between the silver and the carbon-saturated iron, L_Cu(Ag-Fe), the distribution ratio of copper between the Na₂S flux and carbon-saturated iron, L_Cu(flux-Fe), is derived to be 330 at 1473 K. Moreover, the sulfurization removal of copper in iron silver phase into Na₂S flux has been tried at 1473 K. Silver can keep iron from being sulfurized, which enables to maintain the high copper capacity of the Na₂S flux. For this reason, the L_Cu value increases with an increase of sulfur potential. Copper removal proceeds at lower 0.1mass%Cu, and the Cu content decreased to 0.06mass%. The silver phase prevents the sulfur dissolution into the iron, and the sulfur content of iron can be kept lower ( [mass%S]_{in Fe-C} < 0.007-0.02).

Readers Who Read This Article Also Read

Introduction to “The Eddy-current Type Continuous Casting Mold Level Meter, Tetsu-to-Hagane, 70(1984), pp.1160-1166 by Kazuo Sano, Seigo Ando, Yoshihiro Kawase, Ikuo Takahashi, Masaki Takenaka and Kunio Tsuboi”

Tetsu-to-Hagané Vol.100(2014), No.10

Introduction to “The Mechanism of Atomic Emission at a Hotspot and Its Application to the On-line Analysis of Molten Iron, Tetsu-to-Hagane, 77(1991), No.11, pp.1874-1880 by Koichi Chiba, Akihiro Ono, Masao Saeki and Takamasa Ohno”

Tetsu-to-Hagané Vol.100(2014), No.7

Preface to the 100th Volume Memorial Special Issue on Analysis

Tetsu-to-Hagané Vol.100(2014), No.7

Bookmark

Detail

PDF Download

Share it with SNS

Article Title

Removal of Cu in Carbon Saturated Iron by Sulfurization via Ag Phase

Bibtex

Ris

Kinetics of Iron Carburization via Slag Containing Sulfur at 1723 K

Hirokazu Konishi, Hideki Ono, Kenji Tanizawa

pp. 645-652

DOI:

10.2355/tetsutohagane.TETSU-2015-035

Abstract

Kinetics of iron carburization via CaO-SiO₂-Al₂O₃ slag containing sulfur at 1723 K was investigated. The simulated blast-furnace (B.F.) slag (CaO/SiO₂=1) containing sulfur and high basicity slag (CaO/SiO₂=7.6) containing sulfur were prepared. The rate of carburization of iron through the high basicity slag containing sulfur was higher than the rate of carburization of iron through the simulated blast-furnace slag containing sulfur. Furthermore, the rate of carburization of iron through the slag containing sulfur was higher than the rate of carburization of iron through the slag without sulfur. On the other hand, the rates in the middle stage of carburization of iron through the slag containing sulfur were k=6.15×10^–5 mol/m²·s (the simulated blast-furnace slag) and k=1.35×10^–4 mol/m²·s (the high basicity slag), and were much higher than the other stages, and were influence by the existence of sulfur in the slag. The rates in the last stage of carburization of iron through the slag containing sulfur were k=2.95×10^–5 mol/m²·s (the simulated blast-furnace slag) and k=6.21×10^–5 mol/m²·s (the high basicity slag), and were closed to the rates carburization of iron through the slag without sulfur, and were not influenced by the existence of sulfur in the slag.

Readers Who Read This Article Also Read

Novel Two-step Simulation Method for the Dynamics of a Gas Jet-induced Depression on a Water Surface

Tetsu-to-Hagané Vol.101(2015), No.2

Long-term Dissolution Characteristics of Various Fertilizers Made of Steelmaking Slag in a Desalted Paddy Soil Environment (Recovery of a Paddy Field Damaged by the Tsunami Using Fertilizer Made of Steelmaking Slag-2)

Tetsu-to-Hagané Vol.101(2015), No.8

Improvement of Desalted Paddy Soil by the Application of Fertilizer Made of Steelmaking Slag (Recovery of a Paddy Field Damaged by the Tsunami Using Fertilizer Made of Steelmaking Slag-1)

Tetsu-to-Hagané Vol.101(2015), No.8

Bookmark

Detail

PDF Download

Share it with SNS

Article Title

Kinetics of Iron Carburization via Slag Containing Sulfur at 1723 K

Bibtex

Ris

Effect of Natural Gas Injection into Blast Furnace on Combustion Efficiency of Pulverized Coal

Akinori Murao, Yusuke Kashihara, Koichi Takahashi, Nobuyuki Oyama, Hidetoshi Matsuno, Michitaka Sato

pp. 653-660

DOI:

10.2355/tetsutohagane.TETSU-2015-052

Abstract

Reducing CO₂ emission in ironmaking process is pressing issue. Low RAR (reducing agent rate) operation of the blast furnace and the utilization of hydrogenous reducing agent are effective to reduce CO₂ emission. In this study, the influence of the hydrogenous reducing agent on the combustibility of the pulverized coal was examined by using a small scale combustion furnace. As a result, the combustibility of the pulverized coal was improved by simultaneous injection of the pulverized coal and the hydrogenous reducing agent. Furthermore, the fundamental study about the effect of natural gas (CH₄) injection point on the combustibility of the pulverized coal was conducted by experiment using above mentioned small scale combustion furnace and by three-dimensional numerical analysis for further high efficiency. In the case of the relative position of CH₄ injection point and the pulverized coal injection point being near, the ignition point of the pulverized coal came closer to lance tip. Especially, in the case of CH₄ injection point being upstream in blow pipe about 0 to 20 mm from the pulverized coal injection point, the fastest ignition of the pulverized coal was confirmed by experimental and calculation results.

Readers Who Read This Article Also Read

Introduction to Selected Papers Introduction to “On the Top Gas Recycled Reforming Process and the Injected Gas Distribution, Tetsu-to-Hagane, 59(1973), pp.1506-1521 by Hiroaki Nishio and Tsuneo Miyashita”

Tetsu-to-Hagané Vol.100(2014), No.2

Influence of Coke Breeze Positioning on the Sintering Behavior of Pellets and Raw Material Bed with Embedded Pellets

Tetsu-to-Hagané Vol.98(2012), No.11

Preface to the 100th Volume Memorial Special Issue on Ironmaking

Tetsu-to-Hagané Vol.100(2014), No.2

Bookmark

Detail

PDF Download

Share it with SNS

Article Title

Effect of Natural Gas Injection into Blast Furnace on Combustion Efficiency of Pulverized Coal

Bibtex

Ris

Generation Mechanism of Unsteady Bulging in Continuous Casting-1 –Development of Measurement Method for Amount of Unsteady Bulging in Continuous Casting–

Hiroyuki Ohno, Yuji Miki, Yuji Nishizawa

pp. 661-666

DOI:

10.2355/tetsutohagane.TETSU-2015-031

Abstract

Fluctuation of inter-roll bulging in a commercial continuous casting machine was measured in consideration of the fluctuation of the relative distance from the segment to the ground, and compared to the cycle and volume fluctuation of the mold level. The following results were obtained.
1. The amount of segment fluctuation was much smaller than the amount of inter-roll bulging. Therefore, segment fluctuation did not affect the measured results of inter-roll bulging.
2. Inter-roll bulging and the mold level fluctuated with the same cycle, and this cycle corresponded to the cycle calculated from the roll pitch and casting speed. Therefore, it was confirmed that the value measured by an ultrasonic range finder in this study was unsteady bulging.
3. The amplitude of the mold level converted from the amount of fluctuation of inter-roll bulging corresponded to the actual mold level. Therefore, the amount of fluctuation of inter-roll bulging measured in this study was considered reasonable.
In addition, the unsteady bulging shape was estimated.

Readers Who Read This Article Also Read

Development of Continuous Steelmaking Slag Solidification Process Suitable for Sensible Heat Recovery

Tetsu-to-Hagané Vol.99(2013), No.12

Effect of Natural Gas Injection into Blast Furnace on Combustion Efficiency of Pulverized Coal

Tetsu-to-Hagané Vol.101(2015), No.12

Fundamental Study of the Flow Stability in Reverse Roll Coating

Tetsu-to-Hagané Vol.100(2014), No.8

Bookmark

Detail

PDF Download

Share it with SNS

Article Title

Generation Mechanism of Unsteady Bulging in Continuous Casting-1 –Development of Measurement Method for Amount of Unsteady Bulging in Continuous Casting–

Bibtex

Ris

Generation Mechanism of Unsteady Bulging in Continuous Casting-2 –FEM Simulation for Generation Mechanism of Unsteady Bulging–

Keigo Toishi, Yuji Miki

pp. 667-672

DOI:

10.2355/tetsutohagane.TETSU-2015-032

Abstract

In the continuous casting of steel, unsteady bulging contribute to degradation of the slab quality. It has been reported that unsteady bulging is promoted by uneven solidified in the mold, but the effect of uneven solidified on unsteady bulging had not been clarified. In this study, a FEM (finite element model) simulation was constructed. Shell deformation was calculated by an elasto-plastic analysis assuming that the slab moves between the rolls, considering time dependency. The bulging value and mold level fluctuation, which change corresponding to the solidified shell thickness, ferrostatic pressure and roll pitch, were obtained.
In the simulation results, the shell is deformed by ferrostatic pressure. The bulging shell pushes out under the rolls in the thickness direction, and unsteady bulging causes. While the shell is passing through the same pitch rolls, unsteady bulging becomes larger. When the solidified shell is uneven, stress concentrates on the thinner portions. The stress concentration accelerated the unsteady bulging even at the same average shell thickness. Based on this result, an operational index for suppressing unsteady bulging by reducing unevenness of the solidified shell is proposed.

Readers Who Read This Article Also Read

Generation Mechanism of Center Cavity in High-Cr Steel Cast

Tetsu-to-Hagané Vol.100(2014), No.5

Proposal of Grain Growth Model Based on Two-dimensional Local Curvature Multi-vertex Model in the Presence of Pinning Particles

Tetsu-to-Hagané Vol.101(2015), No.4

Development of Numerical Model to Predict Cleavage Fracture Toughness of Ferrite-Pearlite Steels

Tetsu-to-Hagané Vol.101(2015), No.7

Bookmark

Detail

PDF Download

Share it with SNS

Article Title

Generation Mechanism of Unsteady Bulging in Continuous Casting-2 –FEM Simulation for Generation Mechanism of Unsteady Bulging–

Bibtex

Ris

Article Access Ranking

02 Oct. (Last 30 Days)

Deformation-induced martensitic transformation at tensile and compressive deformations of bainitic steels with different carbon contents

ISIJ International Advance Publication
Alloying effects on the microstructure of Fe-1mass%M binary alloys treated by austenitic nitriding and quenching treatment

ISIJ International Advance Publication
Hydrogen effects on fracture resistances of bulk cementite evaluated by in-situ microbending test during cathodic hydrogen charging

ISIJ International Advance Publication
Effect of slag phase on dephosphorization in BOF

ISIJ International Advance Publication
Iron Ore Granulation for Sinter Production: Developments, Progress, and Challenges

ISIJ International Vol.63(2023), No.4
Examples of Fractured Steel Parts during Actual Usage due to Hydrogen Embrittlement and Consideration Regarding the Behavior of Hydrogen at the Prior Austenite Grain Boundary

ISIJ International Advance Publication
Production and Technology of Iron and Steel in Japan during 1988

ISIJ International Vol.29(1989), No.4
Surface and Grain Boundary Segregation on and in Iron and Steels

ISIJ International Vol.29(1989), No.7
Effect of Oxygen Potential on Mineral Formation in Lime-fluxed Iron Ore Sinter

ISIJ International Vol.29(1989), No.8
An Analysis of the Structure of Iron Ore Sinter Cake

ISIJ International Vol.29(1989), No.8

You can use this feature after you logged into the site.
Please click the button below.

Tetsu-to-Hagané Vol. 101 (2015), No. 12

Keyword Ranking

blast furnace

古代製鉄

smelting furnaces

鉄

jang-sik park

korea

three kingdoms period

archaeology

deformation of inclusion during rolling

dp steel hydrogen embrittlement

Tetsu-to-Hagané Vol. 101 (2015), No. 12

Effects of Hydrogen and Nitrogen Gas Mixture on Nitrogen Absorption Rate in Low Carbon Steel Melt

Share it with SNS

Removal of Cu in Carbon Saturated Iron by Sulfurization via Ag Phase

Share it with SNS

Kinetics of Iron Carburization via Slag Containing Sulfur at 1723 K

Share it with SNS

Effect of Natural Gas Injection into Blast Furnace on Combustion Efficiency of Pulverized Coal

Share it with SNS

Generation Mechanism of Unsteady Bulging in Continuous Casting-1 –Development of Measurement Method for Amount of Unsteady Bulging in Continuous Casting–

Share it with SNS

Generation Mechanism of Unsteady Bulging in Continuous Casting-2 –FEM Simulation for Generation Mechanism of Unsteady Bulging–

Share it with SNS

Article Access Ranking

Deformation-induced martensitic transformation at tensile and compressive deformations of bainitic steels with different carbon contents

Alloying effects on the microstructure of Fe-1mass%M binary alloys treated by austenitic nitriding and quenching treatment

Hydrogen effects on fracture resistances of bulk cementite evaluated by in-situ microbending test during cathodic hydrogen charging

Effect of slag phase on dephosphorization in BOF

Iron Ore Granulation for Sinter Production: Developments, Progress, and Challenges

Examples of Fractured Steel Parts during Actual Usage due to Hydrogen Embrittlement and Consideration Regarding the Behavior of Hydrogen at the Prior Austenite Grain Boundary

Production and Technology of Iron and Steel in Japan during 1988

Surface and Grain Boundary Segregation on and in Iron and Steels

Effect of Oxygen Potential on Mineral Formation in Lime-fluxed Iron Ore Sinter

An Analysis of the Structure of Iron Ore Sinter Cake

Advanced Search