logo
言語
ブックマーク
ログアウト

ジャーナル

論文検索サイト

アカウント

© 2022 Steel Science Portal

ヘルプ

詳細検索

論文検索サイト

site
site
site
site

鉄と鋼 Vol. 99 (2013), No. 1

ISIJ International
belloff

Grid List Abstracts
オンライン版ISSN: 1883-2954
冊子版ISSN: 0021-1575
発行機関: The Iron and Steel Institute of Japan

Backnumber

  1. Vol. 110 (2024)

    1. No.7
    2. No.6
    3. No.5
    4. No.4
    5. No.3
    6. No.2
    7. No.1

  2. Vol. 109 (2023)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  3. Vol. 108 (2022)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  4. Vol. 107 (2021)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  5. Vol. 106 (2020)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  6. Vol. 105 (2019)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  7. Vol. 104 (2018)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  8. Vol. 103 (2017)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  9. Vol. 102 (2016)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  10. Vol. 101 (2015)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  11. Vol. 100 (2014)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  12. Vol. 99 (2013)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  13. Vol. 98 (2012)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  14. Vol. 97 (2011)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  15. Vol. 96 (2010)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  16. Vol. 95 (2009)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  17. Vol. 94 (2008)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  18. Vol. 93 (2007)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  19. Vol. 92 (2006)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  20. Vol. 91 (2005)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  21. Vol. 90 (2004)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  22. Vol. 89 (2003)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  23. Vol. 88 (2002)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  24. Vol. 87 (2001)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  25. Vol. 86 (2000)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  26. Vol. 85 (1999)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  27. Vol. 84 (1998)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  28. Vol. 83 (1997)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  29. Vol. 82 (1996)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  30. Vol. 81 (1995)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  31. Vol. 80 (1994)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  32. Vol. 79 (1993)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  33. Vol. 78 (1992)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  34. Vol. 77 (1991)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  35. Vol. 76 (1990)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  36. Vol. 75 (1989)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  37. Vol. 74 (1988)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  38. Vol. 73 (1987)

    1. No.16
    2. No.15
    3. No.14
    4. No.13
    5. No.12
    6. No.11
    7. No.10
    8. No.9
    9. No.8
    10. No.7
    11. No.6
    12. No.5
    13. No.4
    14. No.3
    15. No.2
    16. No.1

  39. Vol. 72 (1986)

    1. No.16
    2. No.15
    3. No.14
    4. No.13
    5. No.12
    6. No.11
    7. No.10
    8. No.9
    9. No.8
    10. No.7
    11. No.6
    12. No.5
    13. No.4
    14. No.3
    15. No.2
    16. No.1

  40. Vol. 71 (1985)

    1. No.16
    2. No.15
    3. No.14
    4. No.13
    5. No.12
    6. No.11
    7. No.10
    8. No.9
    9. No.8
    10. No.7
    11. No.6
    12. No.5
    13. No.4
    14. No.3
    15. No.2
    16. No.1

  41. Vol. 70 (1984)

    1. No.16
    2. No.15
    3. No.14
    4. No.13
    5. No.12
    6. No.11
    7. No.10
    8. No.9
    9. No.8
    10. No.7
    11. No.6
    12. No.5
    13. No.4
    14. No.3
    15. No.2
    16. No.1

  42. Vol. 69 (1983)

    1. No.16
    2. No.15
    3. No.14
    4. No.13
    5. No.12
    6. No.11
    7. No.10
    8. No.9
    9. No.8
    10. No.7
    11. No.6
    12. No.5
    13. No.4
    14. No.3
    15. No.2
    16. No.1

  43. Vol. 68 (1982)

    1. No.16
    2. No.15
    3. No.14
    4. No.13
    5. No.12
    6. No.11
    7. No.10
    8. No.9
    9. No.8
    10. No.7
    11. No.6
    12. No.5
    13. No.4
    14. No.3
    15. No.2
    16. No.1

  44. Vol. 67 (1981)

    1. No.16
    2. No.15
    3. No.14
    4. No.13
    5. No.12
    6. No.11
    7. No.10
    8. No.9
    9. No.8
    10. No.7
    11. No.6
    12. No.5
    13. No.4
    14. No.3
    15. No.2
    16. No.1

  45. Vol. 66 (1980)

    1. No.14
    2. No.13
    3. No.12
    4. No.11
    5. No.10
    6. No.9
    7. No.8
    8. No.7
    9. No.6
    10. No.5
    11. No.4
    12. No.3
    13. No.2
    14. No.1

  46. Vol. 65 (1979)

    1. No.14
    2. No.13
    3. No.12
    4. No.11
    5. No.10
    6. No.9
    7. No.8
    8. No.7
    9. No.6
    10. No.5
    11. No.4
    12. No.3
    13. No.2
    14. No.1

  47. Vol. 64 (1978)

    1. No.14
    2. No.13
    3. No.12
    4. No.11
    5. No.10
    6. No.9
    7. No.8
    8. No.7
    9. No.6
    10. No.5
    11. No.4
    12. No.3
    13. No.2
    14. No.1

  48. Vol. 63 (1977)

    1. No.14
    2. No.13
    3. No.12
    4. No.11
    5. No.10
    6. No.9
    7. No.8
    8. No.7
    9. No.6
    10. No.5
    11. No.4
    12. No.3
    13. No.2
    14. No.1

  49. Vol. 62 (1976)

    1. No.14
    2. No.13
    3. No.12
    4. No.11
    5. No.10
    6. No.9
    7. No.8
    8. No.7
    9. No.6
    10. No.5
    11. No.4
    12. No.3
    13. No.2
    14. No.1

  50. Vol. 61 (1975)

    1. No.15
    2. No.14
    3. No.13
    4. No.12
    5. No.11
    6. No.10
    7. No.9
    8. No.8
    9. No.7
    10. No.6
    11. No.5
    12. No.4
    13. No.3
    14. No.2
    15. No.1

  51. Vol. 60 (1974)

    1. No.14
    2. No.13
    3. No.12
    4. No.11
    5. No.10
    6. No.9
    7. No.8
    8. No.7
    9. No.6
    10. No.5
    11. No.4
    12. No.3
    13. No.2
    14. No.1

  52. Vol. 59 (1973)

    1. No.14
    2. No.13
    3. No.12
    4. No.11
    5. No.10
    6. No.9
    7. No.8
    8. No.7
    9. No.6
    10. No.5
    11. No.4
    12. No.3
    13. No.2
    14. No.1

  53. Vol. 58 (1972)

    1. No.14
    2. No.13
    3. No.12
    4. No.11
    5. No.10
    6. No.9
    7. No.8
    8. No.7
    9. No.6
    10. No.5
    11. No.4
    12. No.3
    13. No.2
    14. No.1

  54. Vol. 57 (1971)

    1. No.14
    2. No.13
    3. No.12
    4. No.11
    5. No.10
    6. No.9
    7. No.8
    8. No.7
    9. No.6
    10. No.5
    11. No.4
    12. No.3
    13. No.2
    14. No.1

  55. Vol. 56 (1970)

    1. No.14
    2. No.13
    3. No.12
    4. No.11
    5. No.10
    6. No.9
    7. No.8
    8. No.7
    9. No.6
    10. No.5
    11. No.4
    12. No.3
    13. No.2
    14. No.1

  56. Vol. 55 (1969)

    1. No.14
    2. No.13
    3. No.12
    4. No.11
    5. No.10
    6. No.9
    7. No.8
    8. No.7
    9. No.6
    10. No.5
    11. No.4
    12. No.3
    13. No.2
    14. No.1

  57. Vol. 54 (1968)

    1. No.14
    2. No.13
    3. No.12
    4. No.11
    5. No.10
    6. No.9
    7. No.8
    8. No.7
    9. No.6
    10. No.5
    11. No.4
    12. No.3
    13. No.2
    14. No.1

  58. Vol. 53 (1967)

    1. No.14
    2. No.13
    3. No.12
    4. No.11
    5. No.10
    6. No.9
    7. No.8
    8. No.7
    9. No.6
    10. No.5
    11. No.4
    12. No.3
    13. No.2
    14. No.1

  59. Vol. 52 (1966)

    1. No.13
    2. No.12
    3. No.11
    4. No.10
    5. No.9
    6. No.8
    7. No.7
    8. No.6
    9. No.5
    10. No.4
    11. No.3
    12. No.2
    13. No.1

  60. Vol. 51 (1965)

    1. No.13
    2. No.12
    3. No.11
    4. No.10
    5. No.9
    6. No.8
    7. No.7
    8. No.6
    9. No.5
    10. No.4
    11. No.3
    12. No.2
    13. No.1

  61. Vol. 50 (1964)

    1. No.14
    2. No.13
    3. No.12
    4. No.11
    5. No.10
    6. No.9
    7. No.8
    8. No.7
    9. No.6
    10. No.5
    11. No.4
    12. No.3
    13. No.2
    14. No.1

  62. Vol. 49 (1963)

    1. No.14
    2. No.13
    3. No.12
    4. No.11
    5. No.10
    6. No.9
    7. No.8
    8. No.7
    9. No.6
    10. No.5
    11. No.4
    12. No.3
    13. No.2
    14. No.1

  63. Vol. 48 (1962)

    1. No.14
    2. No.13
    3. No.12
    4. No.11
    5. No.10
    6. No.9
    7. No.8
    8. No.7
    9. No.6
    10. No.5
    11. No.4
    12. No.3
    13. No.2
    14. No.1

  64. Vol. 47 (1961)

    1. No.14
    2. No.13
    3. No.12
    4. No.11
    5. No.10
    6. No.9
    7. No.8
    8. No.7
    9. No.6
    10. No.5
    11. No.4
    12. No.3
    13. No.2
    14. No.1

  65. Vol. 46 (1960)

    1. No.14
    2. No.13
    3. No.12
    4. No.11
    5. No.10
    6. No.9
    7. No.8-supl
    8. No.7
    9. No.6
    10. No.5
    11. No.4
    12. No.3
    13. No.2
    14. No.1

  66. Vol. 45 (1959)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  67. Vol. 44 (1958)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  68. Vol. 43 (1957)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  69. Vol. 42 (1956)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

  70. Vol. 41 (1955)

    1. No.12
    2. No.11
    3. No.10
    4. No.9
    5. No.8
    6. No.7
    7. No.6
    8. No.5
    9. No.4
    10. No.3
    11. No.2
    12. No.1

キーワードランキング

09 May. (Last 30 Days)

鉄と鋼 Vol. 99 (2013), No. 1

低炭素高炉操業の課題
‐鉄鉱石の還元および軟化溶融挙動‐

植田 滋, 三木 貴博, 村上 太一, 埜上 洋, 佐藤 健

pp. 1-11

DOI:

10.2355/tetsutohagane.99.1

抄録

Due to mitigation of CO2 emission, low reducing agent operation of blast furnace is actively investigated. For blast furnace operation, low reducing agent indicates decreasing consumption of coke or PC with maintaining appropriate heat balance in the furnace. Accordingly, O/C of input burden increases with decreasing reducing agent rate. Coke particle acts as structural material for holding burden and making void in the packed bed for maintaining gas flow. Therefore, decreasing gas flow resistance is an issue in low reducing agent rate operation.
In 1970's, dissection study of blast furnaces had been carried out, and that uncovered existence of cohesive zone. Solid and liquid phases coexist in the cohesive zone. Gas flow resistance increases with a decreasing void fraction in the cohesive zone. Where, coke slit composed with coke layer between half molten iron ore layers act as gas vent slit. However, low reducing rate operation that causes thin or no coke slit. How to increase gas permeability in the cohesive zone with thin coke slit would be a serious issue with a decreasing coke rate for blast furnace operation. In the present paper, investigations on cohesive zone and its permeability are reviewed and softening and melting behaviors of iron ore layer in the blast furnace are thermodynamically discussed.

他の人はこちらも検索

mendeley

ブックマーク

詳細

PDFダウンロード

SNSによる共有

論文タイトル

低炭素高炉操業の課題
‐鉄鉱石の還元および軟化溶融挙動‐

twitter
facebook
mendeley

Bibtex

Ris

時変の確率最適制御を用いた板厚制御におけるばらつき抑制

藤本 健治, 渡邉 敏章, 橋本 芳宏, 西田 吉晴

pp. 12-19

DOI:

10.2355/tetsutohagane.99.12

抄録

This paper is concerned with controller design for the automatic gauge control system. In order to produce steel plates of good quality with high reliability, stochastic optimal control for variance suppression is adopted in this paper. The probability distributions of the physical parameters of the plant system may be time varying. Whereas the conventional stochastic optimal control methods can treat only time invariant probability distributions of the parameters, this paper derives an optimal control law to take care of time varying probability distributions. We apply the proposed method to gauge control in order to suppress the variation of the plate thickness. In addition, a numerical example exhibits the effectiveness of the proposed method.

他の人はこちらも検索

mendeley

ブックマーク

詳細

PDFダウンロード

SNSによる共有

論文タイトル

時変の確率最適制御を用いた板厚制御におけるばらつき抑制

twitter
facebook
mendeley

Bibtex

Ris

ポリエステルフィルムラミネート鋼板を用いたDI缶のPETヘアに及ぼす材料物性の影響

甲斐 政浩, 田屋 慎一, 戸丸 秀和

pp. 20-25

DOI:

10.2355/tetsutohagane.99.20

抄録

Beverage cans have being produced mainly with draw and ironing (DI) process since 1971. The cans in the process are formed in wet condition, generally followed by being washed and lacquer-coated. In 1992, a dry forming process using polyester film laminated steel, called Stretch and Draw forming, was developed. Application of Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film laminated steel to DI process was expected to be beneficial but had a problem (hereinafter referred to as PET-hair) of film shaving or breaking at formed can edge due to no flange making in process. The PET-hair generated on the condition of over 15% in ironing rate, indicating it was difficult to make can body thinner and the laminated material could not be applied for DI process. In this background, we investigated the influences of film thickness, film properties and substrate yield point on PET-hair generation, and obtained the following findings. Firstly, thinner films tend to get PET-hair reduced. Secondly, film properties impact little on PET-hair due to the temperature increase by process heat generation. Thirdly, the substrates with lower yield point tend to get PET-hair reduced.

他の人はこちらも検索

mendeley

ブックマーク

詳細

PDFダウンロード

SNSによる共有

論文タイトル

ポリエステルフィルムラミネート鋼板を用いたDI缶のPETヘアに及ぼす材料物性の影響

twitter
facebook
mendeley

Bibtex

Ris

熱間圧延後の繰り返し曲げ加工プロセスにおける鋼板温度解析

中田 直樹, 松原 行宏, 蛭田 敏樹

pp. 26-31

DOI:

10.2355/tetsutohagane.99.26

抄録

Thermal histories in multi-bending process after hot rolling were clarified by numerical analysis. Temperature vibrates cyclically at strip surface, whereas relatively small vibration can be seen at center in thickness. Transferring speed and cooling condition characterize temperature distributions in strip thickness. In industrial production, water-cooling equipments would be necessary in order to cancel heat generation during bending deformation and maintain strip temperature in appropriate range.

他の人はこちらも検索

mendeley

ブックマーク

詳細

PDFダウンロード

SNSによる共有

論文タイトル

熱間圧延後の繰り返し曲げ加工プロセスにおける鋼板温度解析

twitter
facebook
mendeley

Bibtex

Ris

Nb添加肌焼き鋼の強切削加工後のガス浸炭における表面炭素濃度の異常低下現象

江藤 裕, 梅本 実, 佐々木 和也, 吉田 匡克

pp. 32-39

DOI:

10.2355/tetsutohagane.99.32

抄録

The surface carbon concentration (Cs) of carburized Nb-bearing steel (SCM420Nb) was found to decrease substantially when carburized after severe machining. It was observed that the effect of machining condition is small in normal case hardening steel (SCM420), in which the Cs was in the range of 0.9~1.1%. However, the Cs in carburized SCM420Nb was reduced to 0.61% by mild machining, and 0.38% by severe machining. Since the Cs of severely machined SCM420Nb recovered to > 0.8% after the removal of surface layer by polishing, it was concluded that the abnormal decrease in Cs of SCM420Nb is mainly due to severely deformed surface layer produced by machining. Discussion was made on the abnormally low Cs observed in severely machined SCM420Nb steel with regard to the effect of solute Nb on the carbon activity and the effect of surface roughness. It was found that these effects are small compared with the observed reduction in Cs. Comparing the experimental and calculated carbon concentration profiles, Cs was expected to be reduced immediately after the start of carburizing. Finally, it was proposed that the oxide layer created on the surface during carburizing might be the cause of the abnormally low Cs.

他の人はこちらも検索

mendeley

ブックマーク

詳細

PDFダウンロード

SNSによる共有

論文タイトル

Nb添加肌焼き鋼の強切削加工後のガス浸炭における表面炭素濃度の異常低下現象

twitter
facebook
mendeley

Bibtex

Ris

フェライト鋼へき開破壊靱性予測モデルの構築

柴沼 一樹, 粟飯原 周二, 松原 基行, 白幡 浩幸, 半田 恒久

pp. 40-49

DOI:

10.2355/tetsutohagane.99.40

抄録

A numerical model to quantitatively predict the cleavage fracture initiation in ferrite-cementite steel is proposed. The model is based on the microscopic fracture process of the three stages; Stage-I: formation of fracture origin by cementite cracking, Stage-II: propagation of the cementite crack into ferrite matrix and formation of a cleavage crack, and Stage-III: propagation of the cleavage crack across ferrite grain boundary. Influencing factors on Stage-I is quantified by using tensile testing with circumferential notched round bar specimens. The specimens are made from steels with various ferrite and cementite sizes. Probability of cementite cracking is formulated based on the results of SEM observation and measurements. Notched three point bend interrupted tests with fractography shows the importance of Stage-III because a number of arrested micro-cracks are observed on the fracture surface. In the proposed model, fracture conditions are formulated by the ratio of cementite cracking based on the experimental results on Stage-I and the concept of fracture stress of ferrite matrix on Stage-II and Stage-III. Active zone is divided into finite volume elements. Ferrite grains and cementite particles are assigned based on their distributions into each volume element. Applied plastic strain and stress of each volume element are calculated by macroscopic finite element analysis. Cleavage fracture is assumed to initiate at the time when the fracture conditions of the all stages are satisfied in any one of the volume elements.

他の人はこちらも検索

mendeley

ブックマーク

詳細

PDFダウンロード

SNSによる共有

論文タイトル

フェライト鋼へき開破壊靱性予測モデルの構築

twitter
facebook
mendeley

Bibtex

Ris

へき開破壊靱性予測モデルによる破壊靱性試験の再現解析

柴沼 一樹, 粟飯原 周二, 松原 基行, 白幡 浩幸, 半田 恒久

pp. 50-59

DOI:

10.2355/tetsutohagane.99.50

抄録

The prediction model of cleavage fracture toughness proposed in the authors' previous study is validated by its application to three point bend testing of notched specimens. Experiments are carried out by using steels with various ferrite and cementite sizes. The numerical predicted results of fracture toughness show good agreement with the experimental ones under all the conditions of test temperatures of the all steels. The bottleneck process of cleavage fracture is then evaluated by the number of arrested micro-cracks until all of the fracture process is satisfied. A lager number of the arrested micro-cracks are formed at higher temperature. It means that the bottleneck process is changed from Stage-II to Stage-III with increasing temperature. Grain size at fracture initiation site is evaluated. The scatter of the grain size in the case of the steels with coarse ferrite grains is larger than that of the steels with fine grains. It is therefore shown that the developed model can reproduce the size effect of cleavage fracture. Dependence of the fracture stress on temperature was clarified. In particular, lower temperature makes larger scatter of the fracture stress both on Stage-II and Stage-III. This tendency is remarkable in the cases of the steel with fine grains. Based on the aforementioned results, the validation and the effectiveness of the proposed model are found out.

他の人はこちらも検索

mendeley

ブックマーク

詳細

PDFダウンロード

SNSによる共有

論文タイトル

へき開破壊靱性予測モデルによる破壊靱性試験の再現解析

twitter
facebook
mendeley

Bibtex

Ris

16%Crフェライト単相鋼の局部変形エネルギーとボイド形成挙動

古君 修, 新垣 翔, 山田 直矢, 荒牧 正俊, 大上 悟, 船川 義正

pp. 60-69

DOI:

10.2355/tetsutohagane.99.60

抄録

Tensile tests of 16mass%Cr bearing ferritic steels were performed in order to investigate the effect of the mean interparticle spacing (λ) on the local deformation energy. λ of Cr precipitates was changed from 3.3 to 5.1 μm. The amounts of Cr precipitates in the specimens tested were controlled to be the same level.
The local deformation energy was increased with increasing λ in the specimens without a notch, while the local deformation energy does not depend on λ for the notched specimens.
AsB (Angle selective Backscattered Electron Detector) images of voids beneath the fracture surface showed that the difference of the local deformation energy dependence on λ between notchless and notched specimens was due to the void coalescence processes. This finding reveals that the local deformation energy is influenced by the stress triaxiality through the void coalescence behavior.

他の人はこちらも検索

mendeley

ブックマーク

詳細

PDFダウンロード

SNSによる共有

論文タイトル

16%Crフェライト単相鋼の局部変形エネルギーとボイド形成挙動

twitter
facebook
mendeley

Bibtex

Ris

論文アクセスランキング

09 May. (Last 30 Days)

この機能はログイン後に利用できます。
下のボタンをクリックしてください。

詳細検索

論文タイトル

著者

抄録

ジャーナル名

年

出版日を西暦で入力してください（4桁の数字）。

検索したいキーワードを入力して下さい