logo
言語
ブックマーク
ログアウト

ジャーナル

論文検索サイト

アカウント

© 2022 Steel Science Portal

ヘルプ

詳細検索

論文検索サイト

site
site
site
site

溶接学会論文集 Vol. 42 (2024), No. 2

ISIJ International
belloff
オンライン版ISSN:
冊子版ISSN: 0288-4771
発行機関: JAPAN WELDING SOCIETY

Backnumber

  1. Vol. 42 (2024)

    1. No.2
    2. No.1

  2. Vol. 41 (2023)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  3. Vol. 40 (2022)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  4. Vol. 39 (2021)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  5. Vol. 38 (2020)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  6. Vol. 37 (2019)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  7. Vol. 36 (2018)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  8. Vol. 35 (2017)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  9. Vol. 34 (2016)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  10. Vol. 33 (2015)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  11. Vol. 32.2 (2014)

    1. No.2

  12. Vol. 32 (2014)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  13. Vol. 31 (2013)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  14. Vol. 30 (2012)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  15. Vol. 29 (2011)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  16. Vol. 28 (2010)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  17. Vol. 27 (2009)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  18. Vol. 26 (2008)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  19. Vol. 25 (2007)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  20. Vol. 24 (2006)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  21. Vol. 23 (2005)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  22. Vol. 22 (2004)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  23. Vol. 21 (2003)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  24. Vol. 20 (2002)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  25. Vol. 19 (2001)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  26. Vol. 18 (2000)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  27. Vol. 17 (1999)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  28. Vol. 16 (1998)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  29. Vol. 15 (1997)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  30. Vol. 14 (1996)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  31. Vol. 13 (1995)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  32. Vol. 12 (1994)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  33. Vol. 11 (1993)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  34. Vol. 10 (1992)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  35. Vol. 9 (1991)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  36. Vol. 8 (1990)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  37. Vol. 7 (1989)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  38. Vol. 6 (1988)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  39. Vol. 5 (1987)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  40. Vol. 4 (1986)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  41. Vol. 3 (1985)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  42. Vol. 2 (1984)

    1. No.4
    2. No.3
    3. No.2
    4. No.1

  43. Vol. 1 (1983)

    1. No.3
    2. No.2
    3. No.1

キーワードランキング

08 May. (Last 30 Days)

溶接学会論文集 Vol. 42 (2024), No. 2

Robust Parameter Optimization of Multi-Objective Variables in Laser Metal Deposition Using Machine Learning

Ryo FUKUYAMA, Kiyokazu MORI, Toshitaka SATSUTA, Takeshi ISHIKAWA, Makoto OKUDA, Norio NAKAMURA, Noriyuki SENKE

pp. 51-61

DOI:

10.2207/qjjws.42.51

抄録

Rapid establishment of optimized production parameters is crucial in manufacturing technology. However, to achieve the desired processing results, complex production technologies such as laser metal deposition (LMD) require evaluating numerous evaluation points and processing parameters. Thus, recent studies have explored the integration of artificial intelligence, especially machine learning, into manufacturing technology for fine-tuning the processing parameters. Nonetheless, laser processing engineers encounter challenges in interpreting the processing parameters identified by machine learning, and the robustness of the parameters enabling stable production is unclarified. To address these issues, this study developed a method to visualize the robustness conditions of key processing parameters. Fundamentally, the approach aims to scalarize and transform multiple objective variables related to processing outcomes into a singular evaluation index via weighted scaling. Thereafter, this index is explored in a two-step process employing both local and global search methods. The local search focuses on regions where the evaluation index is stable and favorable, whereas the global search attends to the remaining parameters where this region reaches its maximum. The proposed method exhibits minimal sensitivity to the initial weight settings and regional thresholds, thereby rendering it relatively straightforward for practical application.

mendeley

ブックマーク

詳細

PDFダウンロード

SNSによる共有

論文タイトル

twitter
facebook
mendeley

Bibtex

Ris

論文アクセスランキング

08 May. (Last 30 Days)

この機能はログイン後に利用できます。
下のボタンをクリックしてください。

詳細検索

論文タイトル

著者

抄録

ジャーナル名

年

出版日を西暦で入力してください（4桁の数字）。

検索したいキーワードを入力して下さい